For Chinese writers: turn AI-flavored text back into a human tone
Paste in a piece of AI-generated Chinese and get back a natural rewritten version, with a point-by-point list of changes and a writing-quality score out of 50.
What this tool for removing AI writing traces can do for you
humanizer-zh is a Chinese text-editing tool built specifically to rewrite AI-generated Chinese into a version that reads more like something a real person wrote. It's for writers, editors, and anyone who needs to publish Chinese content.
AI-written paragraphs tend to share the same set of tics: inflating small things into grand significance, piling on promotional adjectives, attributing opinions to "experts say," overusing em dashes and triads, and producing sentences that are neat but have no human voice. Picking these out word by word takes a lot of time.
This tool scans sentence by sentence against a checklist compiled from Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing," covering 24 common patterns across four categories—content, language and grammar, style, and communication traces—then rewrites the problematic passages while preserving the original's core information and tone. It gives you usable rewritten text directly, followed by a change log, and scores it on five dimensions: directness, rhythm, trust, authenticity, and concision.
It's aimed mainly at Chinese writing and has been adjusted for Chinese conventions—for example, patterns like title capitalization that don't apply in Chinese are skipped. If you want it to help you fool AI detectors, that's not what it does.
How it differs from ordinary AI rewriting
General-purpose chat tools can rewrite anything on any topic and can also discuss writing itself along the way; this tool does one thing—cleaning up AI traces sentence by sentence against a single standard, and telling you what it removed.
It scans against a fixed 24-item checklist rather than improvising each time. Wherever inflated significance, vague attribution, or negative parallelism is used, it gets flagged and rewritten. You can check it against the change log instead of relying on gut feeling.
Most "de-AI-ing" approaches stop at making the text clean; this one also puts effort into voice—mixing long and short sentences, acknowledging complex feelings when called for, and allowing first person—so the rewrite reads like a person talking. It rewrites the expression, not the information and tone in the original.
Choose it if you have a piece of Chinese to send out and you're not sure where it reads like a machine wrote it; if what you need is drafting from scratch or a deep discussion of the content itself, a general chat tool is a better fit.
Frequently asked questions about removing AI writing traces
9 questions
What does this skill do?
It rewrites AI-generated Chinese into a version that reads more like something a real person wrote. The point isn't swapping in synonyms but finding the traces of machine writing sentence by sentence and rewriting them. After the rewrite you get a piece of text you can use directly, plus a change log and a quality score.
What types of text can it handle?
Marketing copy, academic abstracts, blog posts, and body text in documentation all work. As long as it's a piece of Chinese text, it goes through the same process: identify AI patterns, rewrite the problematic passages, preserve the core information, and keep the original tone.
Can I paste text directly, or do I have to upload a file?
Either works. You can paste the text in directly, or have it work on content in a file, such as body text saved in article.md. The more complete the context you give it, the better the rewrite will match the original purpose and tone.
Will it change the information and data in my article?
It won't change them on its own. It preserves the core meaning of the original and only rewrites the expression; it won't add new facts or numbers for you either. If the original attributes an opinion to a vague source like "experts say," it will flag the problem, but you still need to fill in the specific source yourself.
How do I know whether the rewrite turned out well?
It scores the rewritten text across five dimensions—directness, rhythm, trust, authenticity, and concision—for a total of 50. A score of 45 to 50 means the AI traces are basically gone; below 35 and it recommends another round of revision.
Does it tell me what it changed?
Yes. Along with the rewritten text, it also gives a brief change log that lists item by item what was cut, such as inflated symbolism like "proof that...," redundant "moreover," triadic lists, or an em-dash analytical sentence at the end.
How is it different from just having ChatGPT rewrite it?
ChatGPT's standard changes from one rewrite to the next; this tool checks sentence by sentence against a fixed set of 24 AI writing patterns and provides a change log and a score. For the same passage, it applies the same rules consistently, making it easier for you to verify and reproduce.
Is it meant to fool AI detectors?
No. Its purpose is to improve writing quality, not to evade detection. By its own account, the best way to de-AI text is to put a real human touch behind it—opinions, rhythm, concrete details—rather than pretending a person wrote it.
Does it mainly handle Chinese or English?
Mainly Chinese. Its rules are compiled from English AI writing guides and adjusted for Chinese writing conventions, so some patterns that don't apply in Chinese are skipped. Purely English text isn't its main target.