Turn AI explainers into tutorials and reviews that even beginners can follow
Give it an AI topic, a draft, or an English technical article, and following Baoyu xp's approach it produces Chinese explainer content that opens with the conclusion, explains in layers, and comes with hands-on tests and links.
What this AI explainer-writing skill can do for you
"Baoyu xp" is a writing skill that follows tech blogger Baoyu xp's approach to help you turn AI topics into Chinese tutorials and reviews that anyone can understand.
You might have an AI topic, a draft, a few notes, or an English technical article on hand. The hard part usually isn't a lack of material—it's explaining the jargon clearly, ordering the layers sensibly, and doing it all without slipping into clickbait. That's exactly what this skill is built for.
It works through a fixed sequence: start with the conclusion and make clear what problem the piece solves; then unfold step by step along the levels from Level 1 to Level 10; in between, include hands-on results, code, or the original prompts; and close with links to GitHub, the Feishu knowledge base, or tools. For titles it favors leading with a number plus a practical promise, for example "5 AI Coding Tools."
What you get is a piece of content ready to publish, not a draft you still have to rework: it opens with a one-sentence conclusion, expands through layered explanation, and closes with tool or source links.
Who it's for: tech bloggers writing AI explainers for newcomers, content operators who need to write prompt tutorials, product folks who often review AI tools, and anyone who needs to translate English technical articles into Chinese with added commentary. It's not suited to writing that is clickbait, fear-marketing, or that trashes competitors—those are things it explicitly refuses to do.
How it differs from other AI explainer-writing tools
General-purpose chat tools excel at flexibility: they can discuss any topic and be adjusted at any moment. What this skill trades for is consistency—it locks in a writing method that has already proven itself, so the tone and structure come out the same every time.
First, a fixed tone. Content written by general-purpose chat usually has no stable personality and easily slides into a neutral instruction-manual voice; this skill always uses an engineer's tone—never pretending to understand, never exaggerating—and likes evidence-based phrasing such as "hands-on tested" and "personally tested"—so what you publish carries a human touch, and readers find it easier to trust.
Second, boundaries on word choice. General-purpose chat is happy to hand you a sensational headline; this skill explicitly avoids clickbait and doesn't peddle AI anxiety, steering clear of words like "shocking," "disruptive," or "revolutionary"—so your content won't slide into emotional marketing.
Third, it produces a finished piece, not merely smooth sentences. Generic rewriting tools mainly help you tidy up sentences; this skill starts from structure and moves along "conclusion → layers → examples → links," carrying a set of mental models and decision heuristics—so when what you need is a tutorial you can publish directly, it saves you far more rewriting than general-purpose chat.
Choosing advice: pick it when you need to produce a clearly styled AI explainer or prompt tutorial aimed at newcomers; if you just want to smooth out a passage and don't care whose voice it's in, a general-purpose chat tool is enough.
Common questions about writing explainer tutorials with AI
7 questions
What is this skill for?
It locks the craft of AI explainers and prompt tutorials into a single method: give the conclusion first, then explain in layers, with hands-on tests and links. Hand it an AI topic, a draft, or a few notes, and following tech blogger Baoyu xp's approach it produces beginner-facing Chinese content you can publish directly.
Who is it meant for?
It's for tech bloggers writing AI explainers for newcomers, content operators who need to write prompt tutorials, product folks who often review AI tools, and anyone who needs to translate English technical articles into Chinese with added commentary. If your readers are just getting into AI, this step-by-step approach fits especially well.
What material can I feed it?
A topic, a draft, notes, or an English technical article all work, and you can also simply say "write me a tutorial about some AI tool." The Baoyu xp skill isn't picky about file format—hand it raw material or just a title and it can get started, and it builds the structure of the finished piece.
What does the content it writes look like?
It opens with a one-sentence conclusion that makes clear what problem the piece solves; then it unfolds step by step from Level 1 to Level 10, weaving in hands-on results, code, or the original prompts; and it closes with GitHub, knowledge-base, or tool links. Titles usually start with a number, for example "5 AI Coding Tools."
Will it write clickbait or exaggerated wording?
No. It explicitly avoids exaggerated words like "shocking," "disruptive," or "revolutionary," and it won't write anxiety-driven lines like "you'll lose your job if you don't learn AI now." It prefers engineer-toned phrasing such as "enhance" or "improve," and it recommends tools only on the basis of hands-on testing.
How is it different from just asking a general-purpose AI chat?
General-purpose chat tools are flexible, but the tone and structure differ every time; this skill fixes a single persona and one writing method—an engineer's tone, conclusion first and layers after—so the structure is consistent every time. When what you need is a beginner-facing AI tutorial with a stable style, it saves you more rewriting time than general-purpose chat.
What does it explicitly refuse to do?
It doesn't write clickbait, doesn't peddle AI anxiety, doesn't repost material without crediting the source, doesn't recommend tools it hasn't tried, and doesn't take sides to belittle competitors. These boundaries are spelled out in its files, so the recommendations you get from it usually come with sources or hands-on notes.